<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1154 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268345</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the rejection of the request for conversion to Drawback. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following precedents and considering the specific circumstances of each case when deciding on Duty Free Import Authorization (DFIA) conversion to Drawback. The Commissioner was directed to consider the appellant&#039;s submissions and adhere to the principles established in the appellant&#039;s earlier case, allowing the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 23:35:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1154 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268345</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the rejection of the request for conversion to Drawback. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following precedents and considering the specific circumstances of each case when deciding on Duty Free Import Authorization (DFIA) conversion to Drawback. The Commissioner was directed to consider the appellant&#039;s submissions and adhere to the principles established in the appellant&#039;s earlier case, allowing the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>