https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175520 The prior covenant giving the Rajpramukh exclusive jurisdiction over jagir succession disputes was treated as abrogated by the Constitution, so that jurisdiction did not revive through the State's general executive power. The validating Ordinance was read as retrospectively creating a forum for such disputes and validating decisions made under it, including by the Rajpramukh, but not as excluding judicial review under Article 226. When deciding succession under the Ordinance, the Rajpramukh was regarded as a quasi-judicial tribunal bound to afford a fair hearing. Because no personal hearing was given, natural justice was not satisfied and the order recognising succession was liable to be set aside. en-us Tue, 16 Aug 1955 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:59:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175520 The prior covenant giving the Rajpramukh exclusive jurisdiction over jagir succession disputes was treated as abrogated by the Constitution, so that jurisdiction did not revive through the State's general executive power. The validating Ordinance was read as retrospectively creating a forum for such disputes and validating decisions made under it, including by the Rajpramukh, but not as excluding judicial review under Article 226. When deciding succession under the Ordinance, the Rajpramukh was regarded as a quasi-judicial tribunal bound to afford a fair hearing. Because no personal hearing was given, natural justice was not satisfied and the order recognising succession was liable to be set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 16 Aug 1955 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175520