<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (11) TMI 258 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175517</link>
    <description>A timely renewal application for a motor vehicle permit filed under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 was held to survive the commencement of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Court applied Section 217 of the 1988 Act with Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, and held that the saving provisions were not exhaustive. A renewal application duly filed and notified under Section 58(2) of the 1939 Act created an accrued civil right to have the claim processed under the repealed law. The absence of a similar preference clause in Section 81 of the 1988 Act did not extinguish pending renewal claims. The renewal had to be considered under the 1939 Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:43:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (11) TMI 258 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175517</link>
      <description>A timely renewal application for a motor vehicle permit filed under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 was held to survive the commencement of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Court applied Section 217 of the 1988 Act with Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, and held that the saving provisions were not exhaustive. A renewal application duly filed and notified under Section 58(2) of the 1939 Act created an accrued civil right to have the claim processed under the repealed law. The absence of a similar preference clause in Section 81 of the 1988 Act did not extinguish pending renewal claims. The renewal had to be considered under the 1939 Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>