<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 598 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175510</link>
    <description>The court directed the petitioner to file a stay petition within one week in the appeal pending before the appellate authority. The Commissioner of Income tax was instructed to consider and pass orders on the application within one month. Coercive recovery of the balance tax was suspended until a decision was made, emphasizing the importance of following proper legal procedures in challenging income tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 17:00:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 598 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175510</link>
      <description>The court directed the petitioner to file a stay petition within one week in the appeal pending before the appellate authority. The Commissioner of Income tax was instructed to consider and pass orders on the application within one month. Coercive recovery of the balance tax was suspended until a decision was made, emphasizing the importance of following proper legal procedures in challenging income tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>