<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1344 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175503</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s orders for the assessment years 2003-04 &amp;amp; 2004-05, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeals. The judgment emphasized that the commercial nature of property use is crucial in determining its classification as an asset under the Wealth Tax Act, excluding the warehouse from assessable wealth due to its utilization for business purposes by the assessee and tenants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 15:44:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1344 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175503</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s orders for the assessment years 2003-04 &amp;amp; 2004-05, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeals. The judgment emphasized that the commercial nature of property use is crucial in determining its classification as an asset under the Wealth Tax Act, excluding the warehouse from assessable wealth due to its utilization for business purposes by the assessee and tenants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>