<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 592 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175498</link>
    <description>Recovery by adjustment against refund claims was treated as sufficient realisation for the purposes of the reward policy where the informant&#039;s information was admitted to have led to detection of customs duty evasion and recovery of dues. The Court held that the authorities could not deny the final reward merely because the dues were not received in cash from the defaulter, and distinguished the cited precedent on the basis that the causal link between the information and recovery was admitted in this matter. A writ of mandamus was issued directing payment of the final reward, with interest in default.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 13:08:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 592 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175498</link>
      <description>Recovery by adjustment against refund claims was treated as sufficient realisation for the purposes of the reward policy where the informant&#039;s information was admitted to have led to detection of customs duty evasion and recovery of dues. The Court held that the authorities could not deny the final reward merely because the dues were not received in cash from the defaulter, and distinguished the cited precedent on the basis that the causal link between the information and recovery was admitted in this matter. A writ of mandamus was issued directing payment of the final reward, with interest in default.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>