<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1130 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268321</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions on all issues, including the allowability of professional charges, medical pathology expenses, repairs and maintenance expenses, vehicle running expenses, professional income, agricultural income, and electricity expenses. The Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections were dismissed as the CIT(A)&#039;s findings were supported by evidence and reasoning that the Revenue failed to rebut.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 08:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1130 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268321</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions on all issues, including the allowability of professional charges, medical pathology expenses, repairs and maintenance expenses, vehicle running expenses, professional income, agricultural income, and electricity expenses. The Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections were dismissed as the CIT(A)&#039;s findings were supported by evidence and reasoning that the Revenue failed to rebut.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>