<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1128 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268319</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by deleting the addition of Rs. 62,06,269 under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was dismissed as not pressed. The Tribunal found the cash payments made by the assessee for purchasing poultry feeds to be genuine and directly deposited in the supplier&#039;s bank account, thus ruling that Section 40A(3) was not applicable in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2016 18:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1128 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268319</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal by deleting the addition of Rs. 62,06,269 under Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was dismissed as not pressed. The Tribunal found the cash payments made by the assessee for purchasing poultry feeds to be genuine and directly deposited in the supplier&#039;s bank account, thus ruling that Section 40A(3) was not applicable in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>