https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268304 The Tribunal affirmed its authority to grant an extension of stay despite the abolition of Section 35C(2A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Emphasizing its inherent power recognized by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal extended the stay granted earlier, noting that delays in appeals were not the appellants' fault. The Tribunal held that the abolition of the section did not affect its power to grant stay, ensuring fairness and justice by allowing the stay to operate during the pendency of the appeals. en-us Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:56:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268304 The Tribunal affirmed its authority to grant an extension of stay despite the abolition of Section 35C(2A) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Emphasizing its inherent power recognized by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal extended the stay granted earlier, noting that delays in appeals were not the appellants' fault. The Tribunal held that the abolition of the section did not affect its power to grant stay, ensuring fairness and justice by allowing the stay to operate during the pendency of the appeals. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 10 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268304