<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1112 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268303</link>
    <description>Refund under Notification No. 41/2007-ST was held not to fail merely because the claim was filed after the original prescribed period, where the export-linked substantive conditions were otherwise satisfied. The Tribunal treated the time-limit objection as procedural and not fatal to entitlement, and applied the amended notification time limit as governing such claims. The refund remained available subject to compliance with the other notification conditions, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the refund was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406276" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1112 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268303</link>
      <description>Refund under Notification No. 41/2007-ST was held not to fail merely because the claim was filed after the original prescribed period, where the export-linked substantive conditions were otherwise satisfied. The Tribunal treated the time-limit objection as procedural and not fatal to entitlement, and applied the amended notification time limit as governing such claims. The refund remained available subject to compliance with the other notification conditions, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge to the refund was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>