<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1110 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268301</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the service tax demand of Rs. 8,43,226 with interest against the appellant for services provided as a Customs House Agent (CHA) and steamer agent (SA). It disagreed with the original authority on the classification of certain services but upheld demands related to storage and warehousing services and steamer agency services. The tribunal imposed a penalty under Section 78 equal to the service tax demand upheld, while waiving the penalty under Section 76 to ensure compliance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1110 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268301</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal upheld the service tax demand of Rs. 8,43,226 with interest against the appellant for services provided as a Customs House Agent (CHA) and steamer agent (SA). It disagreed with the original authority on the classification of certain services but upheld demands related to storage and warehousing services and steamer agency services. The tribunal imposed a penalty under Section 78 equal to the service tax demand upheld, while waiving the penalty under Section 76 to ensure compliance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268301</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>