<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1108 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268299</link>
    <description>In pending service tax appeals involving demands confirmed under Business Support Service and Brand Promotion Service, waiver of the balance pre-deposit was granted largely because substantial amounts had already been deposited before the Commissioner (Appeals). The valuation dispute and the claim for small scale industry benefit were left for consideration at final hearing. For most appellants, recovery remained stayed pending disposal of the appeals; three appellants were nevertheless directed to make additional pre-deposits within four weeks. The operative effect was partial waiver of pre-deposit, with stay of recovery subject to limited further deposit directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:42:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1108 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268299</link>
      <description>In pending service tax appeals involving demands confirmed under Business Support Service and Brand Promotion Service, waiver of the balance pre-deposit was granted largely because substantial amounts had already been deposited before the Commissioner (Appeals). The valuation dispute and the claim for small scale industry benefit were left for consideration at final hearing. For most appellants, recovery remained stayed pending disposal of the appeals; three appellants were nevertheless directed to make additional pre-deposits within four weeks. The operative effect was partial waiver of pre-deposit, with stay of recovery subject to limited further deposit directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>