<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1107 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268298</link>
    <description>Where service tax and interest are paid before issuance of notice, and the department is informed in writing, section 73(3) bars issuance of a notice for the amount so paid. On that basis, penalty proceedings under sections 76, 77 and 78 were held unsustainable because the liability had already been discharged and communicated before the show-cause notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1107 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268298</link>
      <description>Where service tax and interest are paid before issuance of notice, and the department is informed in writing, section 73(3) bars issuance of a notice for the amount so paid. On that basis, penalty proceedings under sections 76, 77 and 78 were held unsustainable because the liability had already been discharged and communicated before the show-cause notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>