<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1105 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268296</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal through remand, emphasizing the applicability of previous rulings and the need for the adjudicating authority to reassess the CENVAT Credit reversal amount. The decision highlighted the non-exempt status of the appellant&#039;s output services, contrary to the Commissioner&#039;s interpretation. The matter was remanded for further verification and compliance with the Tribunal&#039;s directions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1105 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268296</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal through remand, emphasizing the applicability of previous rulings and the need for the adjudicating authority to reassess the CENVAT Credit reversal amount. The decision highlighted the non-exempt status of the appellant&#039;s output services, contrary to the Commissioner&#039;s interpretation. The matter was remanded for further verification and compliance with the Tribunal&#039;s directions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>