<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1100 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268291</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI allowed the appeal due to lack of inquiry on the use of finished goods as inputs by the EOU. The Commissioner did not address the issue of accumulated credits being unusable. The decision relied on a precedent from the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406264" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1100 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268291</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI allowed the appeal due to lack of inquiry on the use of finished goods as inputs by the EOU. The Commissioner did not address the issue of accumulated credits being unusable. The decision relied on a precedent from the Hon&#039;ble Gujarat High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>