<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1096 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268287</link>
    <description>The tribunal overturned the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant and granting them the appeal with consequential relief. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of concrete evidence linking alleged discrepancies at the manufacturer&#039;s end to the denial of credit. It underscores that denial of credit must be supported by clear evidence directly implicating the party seeking credit, rather than relying on investigations at a third party&#039;s premises.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 20:21:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1096 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268287</link>
      <description>The tribunal overturned the impugned order, ruling in favor of the appellant and granting them the appeal with consequential relief. The judgment emphasizes the necessity of concrete evidence linking alleged discrepancies at the manufacturer&#039;s end to the denial of credit. It underscores that denial of credit must be supported by clear evidence directly implicating the party seeking credit, rather than relying on investigations at a third party&#039;s premises.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>