<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1088 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268279</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the revocation of the CHA license in one appeal but partially allowed the appeal in the second case due to the limited involvement of the appellants in the illicit export process. The judgments stressed the significance of diligent verification, adherence to regulations, and the repercussions of failing to fulfill duties as licensed Customs House Agents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1088 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268279</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the revocation of the CHA license in one appeal but partially allowed the appeal in the second case due to the limited involvement of the appellants in the illicit export process. The judgments stressed the significance of diligent verification, adherence to regulations, and the repercussions of failing to fulfill duties as licensed Customs House Agents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>