<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1077 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268268</link>
    <description>Bitumen emulsion was held to fall within the tax entry for bitumen because it retained the essential commercial character, identity and use of bitumen for road works, waterproofing and related applications; entry tax was therefore upheld. Penalty was, however, deleted because the taxability question was genuinely debatable and even departmental views had differed, making non-payment on a non-taxable footing insufficient to attract penalty automatically. Interest could still be recovered in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1077 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268268</link>
      <description>Bitumen emulsion was held to fall within the tax entry for bitumen because it retained the essential commercial character, identity and use of bitumen for road works, waterproofing and related applications; entry tax was therefore upheld. Penalty was, however, deleted because the taxability question was genuinely debatable and even departmental views had differed, making non-payment on a non-taxable footing insufficient to attract penalty automatically. Interest could still be recovered in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>