<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (10) TMI 308 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175479</link>
    <description>Special notice and a meaningful opportunity of hearing under Rule 21(3) and Rule 21(4) of the Bombay Town Planning Rules, 1955 are treated as mandatory safeguards where a town planning scheme affects plots, holdings, possession, compensation or liabilities. A tenant or sub-tenant in lawful possession on the relevant date is a person interested entitled to that procedural protection. Non-compliance with the notice and hearing requirements affects the legality of the final scheme, because the safeguards are intended to secure fairness and prevent arbitrary deprivation of possessory interests. The protection may be waived where notice is actually served and the person chooses not to respond.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:41:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (10) TMI 308 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175479</link>
      <description>Special notice and a meaningful opportunity of hearing under Rule 21(3) and Rule 21(4) of the Bombay Town Planning Rules, 1955 are treated as mandatory safeguards where a town planning scheme affects plots, holdings, possession, compensation or liabilities. A tenant or sub-tenant in lawful possession on the relevant date is a person interested entitled to that procedural protection. Non-compliance with the notice and hearing requirements affects the legality of the final scheme, because the safeguards are intended to secure fairness and prevent arbitrary deprivation of possessory interests. The protection may be waived where notice is actually served and the person chooses not to respond.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>