https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1208 The appellants successfully proved that they had borne the higher duty paid in error, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief, if any. The court distinguished the case from the precedent cited, emphasizing that evidence showed the consumer had not paid the amount. This resulted in a favorable outcome for the appellants, supporting their claim for a refund of excess duty paid by mistake. en-us Mon, 04 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 28 Jan 2009 21:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1208 The appellants successfully proved that they had borne the higher duty paid in error, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief, if any. The court distinguished the case from the precedent cited, emphasizing that evidence showed the consumer had not paid the amount. This resulted in a favorable outcome for the appellants, supporting their claim for a refund of excess duty paid by mistake. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 04 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1208