https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175464 Section 43(2)(rr) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 applies only when the earlier permission under the repealed rent-control law is directly referable to a ground recognised by Section 21(1) or Section 21(2). A permission obtained for occupation of a residential building for business purposes does not fit that scheme, because the statutory proviso excludes such use from the summary route. The provision cannot be expanded to bypass that exclusion, and a fresh inquiry cannot be dispensed with on an unconnected old-Act permission. The application was therefore not maintainable and the rejection of eviction relief was restored. en-us Tue, 28 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 18 Apr 2016 09:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175464 Section 43(2)(rr) of the U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 applies only when the earlier permission under the repealed rent-control law is directly referable to a ground recognised by Section 21(1) or Section 21(2). A permission obtained for occupation of a residential building for business purposes does not fit that scheme, because the statutory proviso excludes such use from the summary route. The provision cannot be expanded to bypass that exclusion, and a fresh inquiry cannot be dispensed with on an unconnected old-Act permission. The application was therefore not maintainable and the rejection of eviction relief was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175464