<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (11) TMI 429 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175460</link>
    <description>Section 20(5) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act required deposit of tax or penalty, as the case may be, before an appeal could be entertained; it did not expressly require payment of interest. The statutory deeming fiction treating interest as tax for recovery purposes could not be extended to the separate appellate-admission provision, and such a restrictive precondition had to be construed strictly. Accordingly, insistence on deposit of interest as a condition precedent for hearing the appeal was held illegal, and the assessee was entitled to have the appeal heard on merits after complying with the balance tax requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:41:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (11) TMI 429 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175460</link>
      <description>Section 20(5) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act required deposit of tax or penalty, as the case may be, before an appeal could be entertained; it did not expressly require payment of interest. The statutory deeming fiction treating interest as tax for recovery purposes could not be extended to the separate appellate-admission provision, and such a restrictive precondition had to be construed strictly. Accordingly, insistence on deposit of interest as a condition precedent for hearing the appeal was held illegal, and the assessee was entitled to have the appeal heard on merits after complying with the balance tax requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>