<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1050 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268241</link>
    <description>The Revenue appealed against the deletion of land value from the net wealth of the assessee by the ld.CWT(A). The ITAT allowed the appeal, considering a retrospective amendment in the Wealth Tax Act and remitted the matter back to the ld.CWT(A) for fresh decision. Penalty appeals for the relevant assessment years were also remitted for re-adjudication. The ITAT&#039;s decisions ensured a fair process and allowed both parties to present their cases before the ld.CWT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 09:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1050 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268241</link>
      <description>The Revenue appealed against the deletion of land value from the net wealth of the assessee by the ld.CWT(A). The ITAT allowed the appeal, considering a retrospective amendment in the Wealth Tax Act and remitted the matter back to the ld.CWT(A) for fresh decision. Penalty appeals for the relevant assessment years were also remitted for re-adjudication. The ITAT&#039;s decisions ensured a fair process and allowed both parties to present their cases before the ld.CWT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>