<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1041 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268232</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the admissibility of credit on event management services and the short payment of service tax due to undervalued commission in print media advertisement services. The appellant was allowed to claim credit for event management services as essential input services despite not being separately registered for such services. The underpayment of tax on commission was deemed inadvertent, and the penalty imposed was set aside under Section 80 of the Finance Act. The impugned order was overturned, and the appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1041 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268232</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the admissibility of credit on event management services and the short payment of service tax due to undervalued commission in print media advertisement services. The appellant was allowed to claim credit for event management services as essential input services despite not being separately registered for such services. The underpayment of tax on commission was deemed inadvertent, and the penalty imposed was set aside under Section 80 of the Finance Act. The impugned order was overturned, and the appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>