<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1029 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268220</link>
    <description>The appellant was not required to pay duty on yarn cleared to the job worker under Rule 16B. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner&#039;s permission for yarn removal satisfied Rule 16B conditions, allowing manufacturers to remove excisable goods for processing without duty payment. The appellants were entitled to Cenvat credit for any duty paid, resulting in a revenue-neutral outcome. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1029 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268220</link>
      <description>The appellant was not required to pay duty on yarn cleared to the job worker under Rule 16B. The Tribunal found that the Commissioner&#039;s permission for yarn removal satisfied Rule 16B conditions, allowing manufacturers to remove excisable goods for processing without duty payment. The appellants were entitled to Cenvat credit for any duty paid, resulting in a revenue-neutral outcome. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>