https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268219 The appellant successfully defended against the department's demand for CENVAT credit, interest, and penalty. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, citing relevant precedent and emphasizing the importance of evidence in determining the intent behind transactions involving CENVAT credit utilization. The lack of proof showing non-payment to the job-worker supported the appellant's argument that the transactions were genuine, leading to the decision in their favor. en-us Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Nov 2015 01:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268219 The appellant successfully defended against the department's demand for CENVAT credit, interest, and penalty. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, citing relevant precedent and emphasizing the importance of evidence in determining the intent behind transactions involving CENVAT credit utilization. The lack of proof showing non-payment to the job-worker supported the appellant's argument that the transactions were genuine, leading to the decision in their favor. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 22 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268219