<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (5) TMI 179 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175455</link>
    <description>Declared duty-paid inputs used in manufacture of declared final products supported Modvat credit, and the credit could not be denied merely because the inputs were received, stored, or processed through an unlicensed or undisclosed rented premises where the lapse was only procedural and the substantive nexus with the final products was proved. However, use of the rented premises as a godown and for movement of goods without proper declaration did constitute contravention of excise and Modvat requirements, so penalty was warranted. The penalty was therefore sustained in principle but reduced to reflect that the goods were cleared on payment of duty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 18:10:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (5) TMI 179 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175455</link>
      <description>Declared duty-paid inputs used in manufacture of declared final products supported Modvat credit, and the credit could not be denied merely because the inputs were received, stored, or processed through an unlicensed or undisclosed rented premises where the lapse was only procedural and the substantive nexus with the final products was proved. However, use of the rented premises as a godown and for movement of goods without proper declaration did constitute contravention of excise and Modvat requirements, so penalty was warranted. The penalty was therefore sustained in principle but reduced to reflect that the goods were cleared on payment of duty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>