https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175454 Section 5 and Rule 9 were construed to require transport permits for movement of tendu leaves from the point of purchase through the warehouse and onwards to branches and sattedars, because the permit scheme was intended to prevent illicit transport and mixing of lawful and unlawful leaves. The requirement was not extended to further distribution by sattedars to mazdoors, as that would be impracticable and inconsistent with the statutory object. The transport restrictions were treated as ancillary to the State monopoly scheme and valid only to the extent they imposed reasonable control up to the stage of supply to sattedars; the broader challenge therefore succeeded only in part. en-us Fri, 25 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Nov 2015 18:06:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175454 Section 5 and Rule 9 were construed to require transport permits for movement of tendu leaves from the point of purchase through the warehouse and onwards to branches and sattedars, because the permit scheme was intended to prevent illicit transport and mixing of lawful and unlawful leaves. The requirement was not extended to further distribution by sattedars to mazdoors, as that would be impracticable and inconsistent with the statutory object. The transport restrictions were treated as ancillary to the State monopoly scheme and valid only to the extent they imposed reasonable control up to the stage of supply to sattedars; the broader challenge therefore succeeded only in part. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175454