<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1013 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268204</link>
    <description>The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s Cross Objection was allowed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the AO recording satisfaction before applying Section 14A read with Rule 8D and upheld the method of apportioning expenses based on turnover for calculating the rebate under Section 88E.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 12:47:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406058" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1013 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268204</link>
      <description>The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s Cross Objection was allowed. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the AO recording satisfaction before applying Section 14A read with Rule 8D and upheld the method of apportioning expenses based on turnover for calculating the rebate under Section 88E.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>