<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 995 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268186</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the assessee were partly allowed, and the appeal of the AO was dismissed. The Tribunal provided detailed reasoning for each issue, ensuring that the principles of revenue recognition and matching costs were appropriately applied. The matters were remitted back to the CIT(A) for verification where necessary to ensure fair assessment and avoid double taxation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 12:45:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 995 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268186</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the assessee were partly allowed, and the appeal of the AO was dismissed. The Tribunal provided detailed reasoning for each issue, ensuring that the principles of revenue recognition and matching costs were appropriately applied. The matters were remitted back to the CIT(A) for verification where necessary to ensure fair assessment and avoid double taxation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>