<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 974 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268165</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that interest on a refund amount should be paid from the date of the refund claim submission, 24.04.2005, to the date of refund sanction, 02.06.2008, following legal precedents. As the refund was granted within three months of the Tribunal&#039;s order, no further interest was payable post-03.06.2008. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to grant interest for the specified period, referencing the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling on interest liability commencement. The Tribunal differentiated the case from another precedent, finding no grounds to interfere with the decision to reject the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 15:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 974 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268165</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that interest on a refund amount should be paid from the date of the refund claim submission, 24.04.2005, to the date of refund sanction, 02.06.2008, following legal precedents. As the refund was granted within three months of the Tribunal&#039;s order, no further interest was payable post-03.06.2008. The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to grant interest for the specified period, referencing the Supreme Court&#039;s ruling on interest liability commencement. The Tribunal differentiated the case from another precedent, finding no grounds to interfere with the decision to reject the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>