<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 969 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268160</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant is eligible to avail CENVAT credit on service tax paid for insurance premiums for existing and retired employees, contrary to the lower authorities&#039; findings. The Tribunal emphasized that insurance services for retired employees are covered under relevant rules and cited precedents to support its decision. Additionally, the Tribunal clarified that service tax on insurance premiums for stocks in foreign warehouses is eligible for credit under the Taxation of Services Rules, overturning the lower authorities&#039; misdirected findings. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406008" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 969 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268160</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant is eligible to avail CENVAT credit on service tax paid for insurance premiums for existing and retired employees, contrary to the lower authorities&#039; findings. The Tribunal emphasized that insurance services for retired employees are covered under relevant rules and cited precedents to support its decision. Additionally, the Tribunal clarified that service tax on insurance premiums for stocks in foreign warehouses is eligible for credit under the Taxation of Services Rules, overturning the lower authorities&#039; misdirected findings. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>