<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 966 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268157</link>
    <description>A civil suit challenging a show cause notice under the Central Excise Act was barred because the statute provided a complete adjudicatory and appellate mechanism, including reply, hearing and appeal, so civil court jurisdiction under Section 9 CPC was excluded. The suit was also premature because no adverse adjudication had been passed on the notice when proceedings were filed, leaving no completed cause of action for civil intervention. The High Court&#039;s remand was set aside and the suits were dismissed, leaving the statutory process intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 966 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268157</link>
      <description>A civil suit challenging a show cause notice under the Central Excise Act was barred because the statute provided a complete adjudicatory and appellate mechanism, including reply, hearing and appeal, so civil court jurisdiction under Section 9 CPC was excluded. The suit was also premature because no adverse adjudication had been passed on the notice when proceedings were filed, leaving no completed cause of action for civil intervention. The High Court&#039;s remand was set aside and the suits were dismissed, leaving the statutory process intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>