<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 964 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268155</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the CESTAT&#039;s order and remitted the case back for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of a detailed examination of transactions to determine the correct valuation for excise duty calculation. The Court highlighted the necessity of ensuring arm&#039;s length transactions and thorough analysis of all relevant documents in excise duty disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=406002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 964 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268155</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the CESTAT&#039;s order and remitted the case back for a fresh decision, emphasizing the importance of a detailed examination of transactions to determine the correct valuation for excise duty calculation. The Court highlighted the necessity of ensuring arm&#039;s length transactions and thorough analysis of all relevant documents in excise duty disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>