<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 51 - CESTAT,BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1188</link>
    <description>Processed peeled and deveined prawns that were only subjected to peeling, deveining, salting or brining, blanching and freezing remained within Chapter 3 of the Central Excise Tariff because those steps did not amount to cooking or other preparation beyond the chapter&#039;s coverage. Applying the HSN notes and supporting fisheries opinions, the classification under Chapter 16 was rejected, so the duty demand based on that classification could not survive. The denial of retest and cross-examination was also treated as contrary to natural justice, and the penalties were unsustainable once the classification issue failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40600" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 51 - CESTAT,BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1188</link>
      <description>Processed peeled and deveined prawns that were only subjected to peeling, deveining, salting or brining, blanching and freezing remained within Chapter 3 of the Central Excise Tariff because those steps did not amount to cooking or other preparation beyond the chapter&#039;s coverage. Applying the HSN notes and supporting fisheries opinions, the classification under Chapter 16 was rejected, so the duty demand based on that classification could not survive. The denial of retest and cross-examination was also treated as contrary to natural justice, and the penalties were unsustainable once the classification issue failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>