https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175438 A joint writ petition is maintainable only where the relief claimed arises from the same cause of action; a common impugned order alone is insufficient if the petitioners are affected differently and their interests are distinct. Applying Rule 375 of the Rajasthan High Court Rules, the Court sustained the objection of misjoinder of parties and causes of action because some petitioners were not adversely affected in the same manner and part of the order concerned only an inquiry. The separate objection based on concealment of material facts and lack of clean hands was rejected, as the alleged non-disclosures were not shown to have been made to mislead the Court or found the relief on a false basis. en-us Wed, 27 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Nov 2015 10:45:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175438 A joint writ petition is maintainable only where the relief claimed arises from the same cause of action; a common impugned order alone is insufficient if the petitioners are affected differently and their interests are distinct. Applying Rule 375 of the Rajasthan High Court Rules, the Court sustained the objection of misjoinder of parties and causes of action because some petitioners were not adversely affected in the same manner and part of the order concerned only an inquiry. The separate objection based on concealment of material facts and lack of clean hands was rejected, as the alleged non-disclosures were not shown to have been made to mislead the Court or found the relief on a false basis. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Jul 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175438