<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 962 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268153</link>
    <description>A three-wheeled tractor or auto trailer intended only to haul a semi-trailer was held to fall under Chapter Heading 8701 rather than 8704. Chapter Note 2 made it irrelevant whether the hauling unit and semi-trailer were cleared together or separately, and the explanatory notes supported treatment of articulated motor lorries, tractor-trailer combinations and similar vehicles as tractors. The statutory definition of tractor controlled the classification, and common understanding could not override the tariff language. The goods were therefore correctly classified as a tractor, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2016 10:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 962 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268153</link>
      <description>A three-wheeled tractor or auto trailer intended only to haul a semi-trailer was held to fall under Chapter Heading 8701 rather than 8704. Chapter Note 2 made it irrelevant whether the hauling unit and semi-trailer were cleared together or separately, and the explanatory notes supported treatment of articulated motor lorries, tractor-trailer combinations and similar vehicles as tractors. The statutory definition of tractor controlled the classification, and common understanding could not override the tariff language. The goods were therefore correctly classified as a tractor, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>