<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (8) TMI 131 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175432</link>
    <description>The appellant was acquitted of all charges by the Supreme Court. The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. The appellant&#039;s conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Penal Code was set aside as the court found he was acting as an innocent carrier and lacked the requisite guilty mind. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and he was acquitted of abetment and bribery charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 09:58:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (8) TMI 131 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175432</link>
      <description>The appellant was acquitted of all charges by the Supreme Court. The prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. The appellant&#039;s conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act and the Penal Code was set aside as the court found he was acting as an innocent carrier and lacked the requisite guilty mind. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and he was acquitted of abetment and bribery charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175432</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>