<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 948 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268139</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the redemption fine and personal penalty imposed on imported goods declared as rerollable steel scrap. The judgment emphasized the significance of genuine import documents, lack of expert verification by Customs Authorities, and the appellant&#039;s bonafide actions in paying the duty. The Tribunal found that the evidence, including import documents and inspection agency certification, supported the appellant&#039;s claim, highlighting that classification cannot be changed without rebutting import documents. The decision underscored the importance of proper verification processes and upheld the appellant&#039;s position in the dispute over the nature of the imported goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2015 01:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405964" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 948 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268139</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the redemption fine and personal penalty imposed on imported goods declared as rerollable steel scrap. The judgment emphasized the significance of genuine import documents, lack of expert verification by Customs Authorities, and the appellant&#039;s bonafide actions in paying the duty. The Tribunal found that the evidence, including import documents and inspection agency certification, supported the appellant&#039;s claim, highlighting that classification cannot be changed without rebutting import documents. The decision underscored the importance of proper verification processes and upheld the appellant&#039;s position in the dispute over the nature of the imported goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>