<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 944 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268135</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning penalties imposed under Section 114(i) and Section 114 AA. It found no malafide intent on the part of the appellants and concluded that the conditions for penalty imposition were not met. Consequently, the penalties were set aside, and the appellants were granted consequential relief in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 12:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 944 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268135</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning penalties imposed under Section 114(i) and Section 114 AA. It found no malafide intent on the part of the appellants and concluded that the conditions for penalty imposition were not met. Consequently, the penalties were set aside, and the appellants were granted consequential relief in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>