https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175418 A fact-finding order may be interfered with in judicial review where it is based on no proper evidence, ignores material evidence, or rests on conjectures and surmises. The primary authority had found no reliable proof that the disputed lands were being used as tank fisheries or for pisciculture on the relevant date, while the appellate authority reversed that finding without properly dealing with the record and relied on weak or unproved material. The appellate order was therefore held vitiated, the High Court erred in declining interference, and the order of the primary authority restoring the classification was reinstated. en-us Tue, 28 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:40:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175418 A fact-finding order may be interfered with in judicial review where it is based on no proper evidence, ignores material evidence, or rests on conjectures and surmises. The primary authority had found no reliable proof that the disputed lands were being used as tank fisheries or for pisciculture on the relevant date, while the appellate authority reversed that finding without properly dealing with the record and relied on weak or unproved material. The appellate order was therefore held vitiated, the High Court erred in declining interference, and the order of the primary authority restoring the classification was reinstated. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 28 Aug 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175418