https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175417 The court held that reservation based on domicile is impermissible under Article 15(1) of the Constitution, distinguishing between "place of birth" and "domicile." However, reservation by way of institutional preference was deemed valid under Article 14, with a 50% reservation upheld for local students in Post Graduate Medical Courses. The court rejected the application of strict scrutiny tests and emphasized the presumption of constitutionality of statutes. A common entrance test was mandated for fairness in admissions, urging legislative action for broader education and reservation issues. en-us Tue, 04 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Dec 2015 22:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175417 The court held that reservation based on domicile is impermissible under Article 15(1) of the Constitution, distinguishing between "place of birth" and "domicile." However, reservation by way of institutional preference was deemed valid under Article 14, with a 50% reservation upheld for local students in Post Graduate Medical Courses. The court rejected the application of strict scrutiny tests and emphasized the presumption of constitutionality of statutes. A common entrance test was mandated for fairness in admissions, urging legislative action for broader education and reservation issues. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 04 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175417