<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (4) TMI 322 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175416</link>
    <description>The court held that judicial review under Article 31C is permissible if there is a direct nexus with Article 39(b). The impugned legislations were found to have a reasonable and direct connection with the principles of Article 39(b), ensuring their protection under Article 31C. The court dismissed all contentions raised by the petitioners, upholding the validity of the laws and rejecting the challenges brought forth.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 15:28:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405905" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (4) TMI 322 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175416</link>
      <description>The court held that judicial review under Article 31C is permissible if there is a direct nexus with Article 39(b). The impugned legislations were found to have a reasonable and direct connection with the principles of Article 39(b), ensuring their protection under Article 31C. The court dismissed all contentions raised by the petitioners, upholding the validity of the laws and rejecting the challenges brought forth.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>