<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 59 - CESTAT,BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1178</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to accept the declared value of the imported goods, emphasizing the importance of evidence of contemporaneous import in determining the value for imposing duty. The judgment highlighted the lack of legal basis for re-fixing the MRP of imported goods and affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision in this regard.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 59 - CESTAT,BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1178</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to accept the declared value of the imported goods, emphasizing the importance of evidence of contemporaneous import in determining the value for imposing duty. The judgment highlighted the lack of legal basis for re-fixing the MRP of imported goods and affirmed the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision in this regard.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>