<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 603 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175408</link>
    <description>The case addressed whether expenditure on a factory building was capital or revenue in nature. The Tribunal found that as no new assets or enduring benefits were created, the expenditure was considered as revenue expenditure for current repairs. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT (Appeals) in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:29:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 603 - ITAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175408</link>
      <description>The case addressed whether expenditure on a factory building was capital or revenue in nature. The Tribunal found that as no new assets or enduring benefits were created, the expenditure was considered as revenue expenditure for current repairs. The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT (Appeals) in favor of the assessee, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175408</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>