<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (5) TMI 1068 - CEGAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175405</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT Kolkata allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the Commissioner due to the lack of adherence to principles of natural justice in determining the annual capacity of the appellants&#039; unit. The order was set aside as the appellants were not provided with the opportunity to present their defense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:47:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (5) TMI 1068 - CEGAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175405</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT Kolkata allowed the appeal, remanding the matter to the Commissioner due to the lack of adherence to principles of natural justice in determining the annual capacity of the appellants&#039; unit. The order was set aside as the appellants were not provided with the opportunity to present their defense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>