<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 936 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268127</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that no penalty could be imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment years 2002-03 to 2008-09. The penalty for the year 2002-03 was removed due to lack of corroborating factual evidence for the peak investment. For the years 2003-04 to 2008-09, penalties were annulled as the gross profit additions were estimated without concrete evidence. The appeals for all years were allowed, and penalties were canceled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 12:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 936 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268127</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that no penalty could be imposed under section 271(1)(c) for the assessment years 2002-03 to 2008-09. The penalty for the year 2002-03 was removed due to lack of corroborating factual evidence for the peak investment. For the years 2003-04 to 2008-09, penalties were annulled as the gross profit additions were estimated without concrete evidence. The appeals for all years were allowed, and penalties were canceled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268127</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>