<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 927 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268118</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues: allowing 80% depreciation on energy meters, treating service line deposits as capital receipts, determining Section 115JB as inapplicable to companies under special Acts, accepting the change in stock valuation method, rejecting the ad hoc disallowance of legal claims, and permitting 60% depreciation on computer peripherals. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of deemed dividend treatment under Section 2(22)(e) regarding loans from BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. The appeals by the assessee were partly allowed, and those by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 14:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 927 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268118</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on various issues: allowing 80% depreciation on energy meters, treating service line deposits as capital receipts, determining Section 115JB as inapplicable to companies under special Acts, accepting the change in stock valuation method, rejecting the ad hoc disallowance of legal claims, and permitting 60% depreciation on computer peripherals. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the deletion of deemed dividend treatment under Section 2(22)(e) regarding loans from BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. The appeals by the assessee were partly allowed, and those by the Revenue were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>