<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 919 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268110</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals as the assessment was invalidated due to non-service of notice under section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act within the prescribed period. Consequently, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deemed unsustainable. The judgment stressed the significance of proper notice service and adherence to timelines for maintaining the integrity of tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2015 10:22:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 919 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268110</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals as the assessment was invalidated due to non-service of notice under section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act within the prescribed period. Consequently, the penalty under section 271(1)(c) was deemed unsustainable. The judgment stressed the significance of proper notice service and adherence to timelines for maintaining the integrity of tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268110</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>