<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 909 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268100</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. The appellant was not liable to service tax on &#039;interchange charges&#039; as it was not taxable under credit card services. Additionally, the mark-up charges from currency conversion when a cardholder used the card abroad were found not to fall under &#039;Credit Card Services&#039; and were not subject to service tax. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2016 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=405843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 909 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268100</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on both issues. The appellant was not liable to service tax on &#039;interchange charges&#039; as it was not taxable under credit card services. Additionally, the mark-up charges from currency conversion when a cardholder used the card abroad were found not to fall under &#039;Credit Card Services&#039; and were not subject to service tax. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=268100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>